Jeremy,

> On Jul 11, 2023, at 11:09, Jeremy Austin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 7:01 AM Frank Carmickle via LibreQoS 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> > On Jul 11, 2023, at 10:53, Dave Taht via LibreQoS 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I know everyone here hates paperwork as much or more than I do.
> > 
> > ... but me, in particular, would really like to find an ONT that runs 
> > fq_codel natively I could recommend.
> 
> Have you looked at SFP modules that do PON? 
> 
> https://www.fs.com/products/141199.html
> 
> https://community.fs.com/blog/basic-knowledge-about-gpon-sfp-transceivers.html
> 
> Can the the thermal envelope for an SFP truly accommodate traffic shaping? 
> I’m thinking not at the current state of CPU art. Would be delighted to be 
> wrong.

Certainly not. My point was that one could connect an SFP to a system that has 
a CPU where the shaping could be performed.

--FC


> 
> Jeremy
> -- 
> Jeremy Austin
> Sr. Product Manager
> Preseem | Aterlo Networks
> Book a call: https://app.hubspot.com/meetings/jeremy548 
> 1-833-773-7336 ext 718 | 1-907-803-5422
> [email protected]
> www.preseem.com
>      

_______________________________________________
LibreQoS mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/libreqos

Reply via email to