Date: 03 Apr 2003 12:47:00 -0500 From: terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [LIB] Battery Life
Hi John, On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 11:27, John Musielewicz wrote: > Heh- but is that because the chip uses more power or the battery has more > juice!?! Plus software emulation is slow. Some of them seem to be the same size and shape, which probably means the same size batteries. > > > > It's really tough to revisit old computer technology. The > > This is what I don't understand about mobile technology now-a-days. Who uses > it? I don't know, but from limited observation, most mobile users seem to want their 'stuff' with them more than anything, and aren't particularly focused on running on a battery for long periods. > What good is the latest machine with all the little bells if the battery > is dead and it can't be used? When people comment on 'old' technology just > what do they mean? Hardware that reasonably supported what is now obsolete software? > (Which is why I'm using > 'old' technology today- it is as good as new technology- in most respects). You won't get much of an argument from me on that score! I run 2-450mhz and a 1ghz desktop systems - not one of the latest 2.4mhz systems - but then I use Win98se (under Linux of course). I did upgrade my 50CT to a 70CT however. And when I'm doing technical writing I use Word 2.0c, and convert it into a later version to send it off. (I also have a '80 Fiat Spyder, a '80 BMW M/C, and a '68 Suzuki 500 2-stroke - and I live in a 100 year old house!) As for battery life, I don't think that there has been as much of a technology increase as the need has been increased by hardware and software. I was just saying that if battery life reaches a level of pain, then there is little else to do but buy new -or- downgrade to a 70CT since it has longer battery life than the 100/110. That's the reason I've stayed with the 70. I have seen close to 6 hours on the high-capacity battery while reading documentation. Cheers, terry > > > > > On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 09:23, John Musielewicz wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:17:14 -0600 > > > From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Subject: Re: [LIB] Battery Life > > > > > > Hi Terry > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "terry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 7:17 AM > > > Subject: Re: [LIB] Battery Life > > > > > > > > > > Date: 03 Apr 2003 08:17:49 -0500 > > > > From: terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Subject: Re: [LIB] Battery Life > > > > > > > > Hi John, > > > > > > > > I don't remember, but you can look it up at fujitsupc.com - look for > > > > tablet pc's. They do something interesting by using the CD drive bay > as > > > > a place to put another battery. The 12 hours is by using a long-life > > > > regular battery with the drive bay battery. I would > > > > > > Hmmm...I could do the same by picking up an Igo external battery, I > guess, > > > they would run a 110 a good 16 hours. But I hate doing that because it > ruins > > > the portability of the system. The perfect thing about the 110 is its > the > > > perfect size- small enough to pack around with a bunch of pcmcia cards > yet > > > large enough to easily use!! It has everything a person needs, a nice > large > > > color screen, 2 cardbus ports, a very large keyboard, irda, and a > docking > > > port. Through the cardbus ports you have usb, wireless, serial and > parallel > > > connectivity- whatever a person wants plus if you add a dock you can > always > > > just use the Libretto as the central cpu and hook up external stuff for > the > > > desktop. > > > > > > guess that you > > > > would have to go with a Transmeta based system to get extreamely long > > > > battery life. Libretto has too. The 233/266 Pentiums were small > > > > furnaces compared with earlier and later processors. I may have > > > > exagerated the size increase - it was just a WAG. > > > > > > I have read the Transmeta cpu isn't that low powered. I have seen side > by > > > side comparisons to Tiwanese Intel cpu clones and the Tiwanese beat the > > > Transmeta hands down. But anyway, what would be wrong about using modern > day > > > technology to improve the US Libretto into a power miser and > reintroducing > > > it? If it got 14-16 hours on a single charge on a 2000 or 2400 mAh > single > > > battery under heavy use, had a 233-300 MHz Intel pentium cpu, more ram > (ram > > > could be added without affecting battery life that much), and the same > > > footprint as the 110CT it would be a hot little machine!! I, for one, > would > > > snap a machine like that up! > > > > > > > > > > > I only use my Libretto 70 for 3-4 hours on the battery, and it's been > > > > great. But I don't depend on it for anything other than recording > notes > > > > and editing programs. I have noticed that my new 10g hard drive > > > > increased battery life also. > > > > > > My 110CT is my only computer so I use it for everything (ooopps, low > > > battery- time to connect AC- sucks!!) and it does the job quite well!!! > Who > > > made the 10 gig drive? My 15 gig was made by IBM and is also quite low > > > power. XP also controls power really well except there is no backlight > > > control. I've been meaning to write a windows driver for the backlight > for > > > XP but haven't gotten around to it yet. Been to busy in Dos writing all > the > > > stuff it needs!! > > > > > > > > > > > terry > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 01:35, John Musielewicz wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 00:26:53 -0600 > > > > > From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Subject: Re: [LIB] Battery Life > > > > > > > > > > Hi Terry > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion. 10% larger is too large. Just out of > > > curiousity > > > > > what is the milliamps of the battery which gives the longest life? > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "terry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: "Libretto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:33 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [LIB] Battery Life > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: 02 Apr 2003 17:33:18 -0500 > > > > > > From: terry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [LIB] Battery Life > > > > > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at the Fujitsu LifeBook P1000,2000. About 10% bigger, > > > > > > Transmeta 800+ processors, and 8 - 12 hours on batteries in > various > > > > > > configurations - with your choice of windoze versions. Sorry it's > not > > > a > > > > > > Libretto tho :>( Also, the prices aren't real bad $1200 - $1500 > USD. > > > > > > > > > > > > terry > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 14:43, John Musielewicz wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:38:25 -0600 > > > > > > > From: "John Musielewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > Subject: Battery Life > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I love my little 110CT. It is such a cool machine. It zips along > XP, > > > > > runs my > > > > > > > programs super fast with its speedy little 233 MHz pentium mmx > and > > > > > wopping > > > > > > > 64 meg of ram. The size is absolutely perfect and the screen > surburb > > > for > > > > > > > reading ebooks. However, there is one thing that bugs me. At 4 > hours > > > the > > > > > > > battery life is just too short!! I need about 8 to 10 hours. > There > > > is > > > > > not a > > > > > > > notebook that compares to the 110CT out there with the kind of > > > battery > > > > > life > > > > > > > I need except the Hewlett Packard 200LX and that, being a XT and > too > > > > > small, > > > > > > > would not be useable. Why are there no improvements being made > to > > > the > > > > > > > Libretto series? All they need to do is improve battery life > which > > > > > shouldn't > > > > > > > be to hard with the speed of the processor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > > > > > > > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > > > > > > > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > > > > > > > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > > > > > > > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > > > > > > > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > > > > > > > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > > > > > > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives > > > > > > > > > > > > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > > > > > > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > > > > > > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > > > > > > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > > > > > > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > > > > > > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > > > > > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives > > > > > > > > > > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > > > > > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > > > > > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > > > > > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > > > > > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > > > > > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > > > > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives > > > > > > > > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > > > > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > > > > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > > > > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > > > > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > > > > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > > > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives > > > > > > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > > > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > > > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > > > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > > > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > > > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives > > > > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > > ************************************************************** > > > > > ************************************************************** > http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list > http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives > > -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- > Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be > addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text > on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe > --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ > Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest > ************************************************************** ************************************************************** http://libretto.basiclink.com - Libretto mailing list http://www.silverace.com/libretto/ - Archives -------TO UNSUBSCRIBE------- Reply to any of the list messages. The reply mail should be addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Then replace any text on the message's subject line: cmd:unsubscribe --------TO UNSUBSCRIBE DIGEST------ Do above but with this on subject line: cmd:unsubscribe digest **************************************************************
