I haven't heard any negative comments on any of the RFC patch sets so I'm
going to go ahead and push these to the repository today. Everything
compiles fine on my system and the regression tests all pass, but if you
notice anything awry let me know.
---
Paul Moore (10):
arch: add support for syscall name resolution
arch: provide the basic infrastructure for non-native architecture support
db: enable basic filter collection support
bpf: provide basic multiple arch/filter support
bpf: remove _gen_bpf_chain_lvl()
pfc: provide basic multiple arch/filter support
api: disable certain operations with multiple architectures
api: add support for multiple architectures
tests: add tests for the new multi-arch/filter support
docs: add manpages for the seccomp_arch_{exist,add,remove}() and
seccomp_merge() API
tests/.gitignore | 3 +
tests/15-resolver.c | 36 +++++++++++++++
tests/15-resolver.tests | 11 +++++
tests/16-arch-basic.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/16-arch-basic.tests | 24 ++++++++++
tests/17-arch-merge.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/17-arch-merge.tests | 24 ++++++++++
tests/Makefile | 5 ++
8 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tests/15-resolver.c
create mode 100644 tests/15-resolver.tests
create mode 100644 tests/16-arch-basic.c
create mode 100644 tests/16-arch-basic.tests
create mode 100644 tests/17-arch-merge.c
create mode 100644 tests/17-arch-merge.tests
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
libseccomp-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libseccomp-discuss
