On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:36:34PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > A number of the tests made assumptions about the native architecture > which would cause problems when there was a byte-ordering mis-match > between the native system and the architectures used in the test. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]> > --- > tests/16-sim-arch_basic.c | 45 > ++++++++++++++++--------------------- > tests/16-sim-arch_basic.py | 16 +++++-------- > tests/17-sim-arch_merge.c | 29 +++++++++++------------- > tests/17-sim-arch_merge.py | 10 +++----- > tests/19-sim-missing_syscalls.c | 15 ++++++------ > tests/19-sim-missing_syscalls.py | 5 ++-- > tests/23-sim-arch_all_le_basic.c | 45 > ++++++++++++++++--------------------- > tests/23-sim-arch_all_le_basic.py | 16 +++++-------- > tests/26-sim-arch_all_be_basic.c | 18 ++++++--------- > tests/26-sim-arch_all_be_basic.py | 5 +--- > 10 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
Hi Paul, Thanks. That mostly fixes these 4 tests on big-endian. However, fuzz tests on tests 17 and 19 fail. I think the fuzz tests needs to be removed according to 9013ff76b9f2d4e5b40cedac4a20622aef823c1a right? I forgot to mention that test 11 also has similar problems (sorry, somehow I missed that before). If you could fix that in a similar way that would be nice. After that, all simulator tests should pass on big-endian. -- markos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ libseccomp-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libseccomp-discuss
