[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your ideas are very much welcome. However, I would bet that
.Net-specific functionality such as Reflection.Emit is just one of
many new technologies that everyone has not had the time to fully
investigate and embrace. Your proposals would probably be better
accepted if you could write up a brief indicating the benefits and
pitfalls of such an approach and what would be required to maintain
the code. If the developers were to implement code they did not fully
understand and you were to disappear, it would just be wasted time as
they would end up ripping all of it out later. In short, make a sales
pitch. J
Thanks,
Sam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*I agree. My experience with reflection in .NET is limited, as I haven't
encountered .Emit and some of the other technologies before, but it
looks like I need to start reading up. Also, I'm wondering if .NET 2.0's
anonymous types could be used to generate the packet classes on the fly?
John Hurliman
*
_______________________________________________
libsecondlife-dev mailing list
libsecondlife-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/libsecondlife-dev
