On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 08:45 -0400, Paul Giblock wrote: > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 15:04 +1000, Jeff Franks wrote: > > > > I have used libsigc++-2.0 for some time, like this: > > > > 1. I derived my base class from sigc::trackable. > > > > 2. I added an include for <sigc++/sigc++.h> to the base class header file > > This is the main thing, I had to make a symbolic link > from /usr/include/sigc++-2.0/sigc++ to /usr/include/sigc++ for it to > find the header. But I still get a slew of errors
Not if you use pkg-config, as Jeff said. API versioning is a good thing. > > 3. I added these lines to configure.ac: > > > > PKG_CHECK_MODULES(SIGC, sigc++-2.0 >= 2.06) > > AC_SUBST(SIGC_CFLAGS) > > AC_SUBST(SIGC_LIBS) > > > > 4. I added this line to Makefile.am: > > > > AM_CXXFLAGS = @CXXFLAGS@ @SIGC_CFLAGS@ > > > > and I added $(SIGC_LIBS) to the end of the to the _LIBADD macro. > > I've never used Automake/Autoconf... I guess I'll give it a shot. Time > to move up I suppose. > > Thanks Jeff, -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
