Hi
If I "touch" the Makefile before calling make, the compiling process begins
(version 2.0.15). Unhopefully, it fails after entering the "scripts" directory
because there is no Makefile for it : inside the "scripts" directory
there is a
Makefile.am and a Makefile.in, but no Makefile
Where does this come from ? I have ran the "configure" script though... :(
Nicolas
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Surely, the following output is from configure, not make?
/bin/sh ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating sigc++-2.0.pc
config.status: creating sigc++/Makefile
config.status: creating scripts/Makefile
config.status: creating tests/Makefile
config.status: creating examples/Makefile
config.status: creating MSVC_Net2003/Makefile
config.status: creating libsigc++-2.0.spec
config.status: creating docs/Makefile
config.status: creating docs/images/Makefile
config.status: creating docs/reference/Makefile
config.status: creating docs/reference/Doxyfile
config.status: creating sigc++config.h
config.status: sigc++config.h is unchanged
config.status: executing depfiles commands
/bin/sh ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating sigc++-2.0.pc
config.status: creating sigc++/Makefile
What platform (linux distribution, for instance), is this?
The output above IS what I get when I try to "make" the program. The linux
distribution is a Fedora 1.
Nicolas.
_______________________________________________
libsigc-list mailing list
libsigc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
_______________________________________________
libsigc-list mailing list
libsigc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
