On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 13:30 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 12:12 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:00 -0500, Carl Nygard wrote: > > > http://www.3sinc.com/opensource/boost.bind-vs-sigc2.html > > [snip] > > > Docs updated. > > [snip] > > > > I thought I'd review this again, because I lost track of what changes > > were made. > > > > 1. In several cases, you show > > sig.connect(&Func); > > but show > > sig.connect(sigc::ptr_fun(&Func)); > > for the libsigc++ example. > > > > But I believe (Am I correct, Martin?) that sig.connect(&Func) will work > > with both APIs, and I believe that boost has a ptr_fun() too. It does > > not seem to be an API difference. > > > > 2. In "Automatic disconnection", > > the use of operator() instead of a normal method will just cause > > confusion. > > > > 3. In "Slot Binders" > > Can you expand on this question: "TODO: answer questions: a) What's up > > with the No Clue entry, anyone?", please. In fact, please just ask your > > TODO questions on this mailing list. > > > > 4. Some of the "-ed" comments seem outdated now. It would be nice to > > clean these up. > > Carl, could you please make these changes. It would be very helpful.
Yeah I just took a look at the doc yesterday to see about porting it to a wiki format, and was embarrassed to see those comments still there. Got busy with work... you know how it goes. BTW, should I even bother with the wiki business? I figured a collaborative editing process might be a good basis for the document, but then again I have no experience with the C++ standards documentation requirements (i.e. formatting, file formats, etc.) Regards, Carl _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
