On Monday 03 July 2006 22:42, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: [snip] > Yes, but I'm not expecting sigc++ to handle all the GUI aspects. I expect > it only to provide a basement for this, like it provides signals. [snip] > Did you look at my code examples? Conditions vs. custom aggregation of > signals have two advantages: 1) less coding, and 2) less error probability, > since condition is specified only once and you don't have to synchronize > condition and state tracking manually (plus maybe setting of initial > state.)
I did, but since you give examples based on gtk+ (and I know how gtk+ does it) I couldn't see how anything could be implemented for gtk+/gtkmm, via changes to libsigc++, which would do anything close to what you propose. I do not think I really understand your proposal for a "basement" to provide "custom aggregation of signals" anyway (this may well be my problem not yours) - you offered to have a first cut at providing some code, so why not have a go at it? Chris _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
