Hi! Talking about "no bugs" and "good documentation", I just want to point out that my mail below still contains valid documentation errors that one can stumble over. (Yes, the docs are indeed quite good, and after finding out how to implement marshallers properly I am still perfectly happy with libsigc++.)
Am Montag, 06. November 2006 16:48:59 schrieb Hans Meine: > I am just trying to use libsigc++, and I need the feature that each > pre-operation callback (slot) can cancel my operation by returning false. > > After looking at > http://libsigc.sourceforge.net/libsigc2/docs/manual/html/ch04s03.html > I implemented a mashaller, only to get an error about result_type. > > Now I already wondered about some design issues (OutType instead of > result_type, "marshaller" instead of "accumulator" etc.), which I then > realized were fixed, as can be seen in the reference documentation (which I > had to look at, since signal<void, my_arg_t, marshaller> was also an > obsolete, non-working syntax): > http://libsigc.sourceforge.net/libsigc2/docs/reference/html/classsigc_1_1si >gnal_1_1accumulated.html > > Indeed, that page even contains an "interruptable_accumulator" which is > exactly what I need. However, there is another (small) glitch: The for > loop tries to increment n_ (C&P error from above). > > Hopefully someone finds the time to update the docs, apart from that > libsigc++ seems to be quite neat (and the tutorial-style-docs are very > helpful nevertheless!). Now I hope the runtime (per-call) performance is > not too far behind my old, ugly, virtual-method-hook-class-in-std::vector > solution... -- Ciao, / / /--/ / / ANS _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
