On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 09:38 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 21:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 08:19 -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > > The typedef in question is protected by a #ifdef and a comment saying > > > > that it exists only for backwards compatibility. If I edit the include > > > > file in /usr/include that declares the corresponding #define and remove > > > > it, my compile succeeds. > > > > > > I'd be very tempted to remove that in out libsigc++ 2.2 version if it > > > seems necessary. Hopefully it's only API in a header, and not part of > > > the shared library. > > > > I think I did that in libsigc++ 2.1.x. Have you tried that? > > No, I wasn't actually aware of libsigc++ 2.1. Is there an -announce > list I should be subscribed to?
I don't particularly want people to use 2.1 yet unless they need to. I'd really like to know whether it builds for you. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
