Thank you Paul for the quick reply,

I know this might sound stupid but... I think I am going to try gtkmm again.
After receiving email I myself have taken a look again at the gtkmm tutorial
and found it not that difficult to understand. I guess when I first started
programming in gtkmm last year I did not understand about C++ as deep as
present, which scared me away. But after weeks of being stuck with my
software I think I better switch to gtkmm. I have even tried to write my
software in raw C/GTK+ code but it was kinda ugly...

BTW, do you guys have any wrapper for GtkMozEmbed? Is there anything that I
can use instead of it? I just want to embed a browser window into my
application and I don't know how to embed GtkMozEmbed into Gtkmm app?



On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Paul Davis <p...@linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Phong Cao <phn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > I am familiar with GTK+ and new to libsigc++. I just want to ask you guys
> if
> > there is a way to use libsigc++ to connect a GTK+ function with a
> callback
> > function which is a member of a class. Consider this code:
>
> (1) why not use gtkmm?
> (2) sigc++ signals are not even remotely related to GTK signals.
> (3) you cannot connect C++ object member functions to GTK signals directly
> (4) inventing a way to do it indirectly implies reinventing one of the
> core parts of gtkmm.
>
> > I thought about using Gtkmm instead of Gtk+ a long time ago but the only
> > Gtkmm tutorial available is in the Gtkmm main website and it is so
> > confusing.
>
> if you find the basic idea of gtkmm confusing you should probably not
> be programming in C++, or at least not trying to write a GUI app in
> C++.
>
> what did you find confusing about it?
>
_______________________________________________
libsigc-list mailing list
libsigc-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list

Reply via email to