On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 22:15 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > On 06/01/2012 21:21, Murray Cumming wrote: > > Instead of checking for particular compiler versions, we would generally > > add a test that is run during configure time. That would test for the > > compiler capability. There are already several tests like this in > > libsigc++. > > That's not quite enough -- the type_trait specialization is supposed to go > into > a header (sigc++/functors/functor_trait.h looks appropriate) that users of the > library will be including. > > If we add C++11-specific code there, we will break compilation for everyone > who > uses sigc++ and doesn't compile their application/library with -std=c++0x.
And I guess that it's onsidered acceptable to use -std=c++0x with a library that was not compiled with that option? Then, yes, that does mean that a configure check won't be enough. Maybe we can just put this in a separate header that people must explicitly include if they need it? However, it would still need a configure check, just so we can have a test for it when appropriate. -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
