On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 20:54 +0100, Chris Vine wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:44:02 +0200 > Kjell Ahlstedt <kjell.ahlst...@bredband.net> wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be cleaner to just (or also) add a specific > > > connect(std::function<>) method overload that did this > > > automatically? > > Sure. I wish I knew how to do it. sigc::track_obj() forces you to > > manually specify which trackable objects the functor contains. This > > is not nearly as nice as the automatic detection of trackable objects > > in the rest of libsigc++. The enormous use of C++ templates in > > libsigc++ is near, or even beyond, the limits of my comprehension. > > I have to say I disagree with that. One of the banes of libsigc++ is > that it makes any slot for a non-static method of a class deriving > from sigc::trackable as a tracked slot, which is sometimes what you do > not want. It is better to enable the user to choose when constructing > the slot. [snip]
Can you give us an example of when you would not want the slot to be tracked? -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
