Steven Van Ingelgem <[email protected]> writes: > Just a small question: > Is there a possibility to get rid of the fact that we need to pass a public > key into the functions? > > I think it can be internally calculated without a problem as we get the > private key anyhow.
I recall this was discussed earlier. Was it the case that this problem only affects the libgcrypt backend? I have some vague memory of a patch going in to address this problem, but maybe it was OpenSSL specific. /Simon > > Grtz, > Steven > > 2009/9/29 Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> > >> Daniel Stenberg <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Hi friends, >> > >> > We've nailed a range of bugs recently and I'm happy to present >> > >> > libssh2 1.2.1 >> >> Congratulations! >> >> I've updated my binary Windows build, please see: >> >> http://josefsson.org/gnutls4win/libssh2-1.2.1.zip >> http://josefsson.org/gnutls4win/libssh2-1.2.1.zip.sig >> http://josefsson.org/gnutls4win/mingw32-libssh2_1.2.1-1_all.deb >> >> It uses libgcrypt. The DLLs for libgcrypt and libgpg-error are included >> in the archive, so it should work directly. >> >> /Simon >> _______________________________________________ >> libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
