Hi Daniel, On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:48:37AM +0100, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > > I mentioned this on IRC, but I think I should note it here as well: > > I don't think we need to name all examples "ssh2_" something, as ALL > examples are ssh2-based. I think x11.c as a name is fine. Or > possibly x11-foward.c. > Indeed.
> It struck me that I probably never added it to Makefile.am because > the example is not at all as portable as many (most?) the other > examples but is rather Linux/*nix-centric (and then I forgot about > it). I'm not sure that should be a problem to add it anyway, but I > thought I should mention it in case someone out there has any ideas > or opinions on the matter. > I thought it was an oversight when I did this patch. It's true, it's not portable because it's X11 related programming, maybe Simon who is used cygwin can confirm or give advices to handle portability ? Regards -- Sofian Brabez Security R&D Engineer Email: [email protected] Website: www.wallix.com _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
