Daniel Stenberg wrote: >> Thus, to me, it doesn't seem to be highly portable code > > I beg to differ.
I think you are talking past each other. The test case is not at all portable, this is likely point. > Perhaps a more productive way forward is to continue helping us > improving what we have? It is helpful - bugs in tests matter too. If noone can fix the test (I can't) then I think it's better to take the test out. //Peter _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
