Jose Baars wrote: > Maybe consider changing the linked list in a pre allocated array > where the index has a direct relation to the sequence number .. > It will use a bit more memory, but a lot less CPU,
It's a solid optimization in many cases, but the impact obviously depends on list length. I guess we don't have many enough packets on that list in libssh2 for the list itself to be a problem, or..? //Peter _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
