Alexander Lamaison wrote: > > And related, do you still get problems if you (as a temporary > > work-around) use a smaller buffer? > > That would work. It's what I used to do when libssh2 had severe > problems that limited buffer size to something like 32k.
I guess the question is if it still works with the changes that have been made to the SFTP support in libssh2. But no doubt we want to fix this once and for all so that buffer sizes really are arbitrary numbers as far as the library is concerned. I believe it's done at transport level at least, only SFTP left. :) //Peter _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
