On 6 March 2012 17:57, Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Steven Dake wrote: > >> While the buffer is indeed allocated to a safe length, better safe then >> sorry. > > Sure, but we aim for C89 compatibility so snprintf() isn't generally > available - we would then need to provide an internal version for the > inferior systems!
That's what I thought. But a quick rgrep and I find we use it all over the place! Alex _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
