On Fri, March 16, 2012 13:36, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > It might cause confusion and badness.
:-) Thanks for the quick responses! >> a clearer asynchronous API should be implemented, and a synchronous one >> which builds on that. > > We've discussed something like that but nobody has yet volunteered to do the > work so we keep to the old and existing API... Interesting. I'm working on a product which builds on libssh2, and depending on how that plays out, there could be mutual benefits in helping out with libssh2... at the moment I'm swamped in work however. :-P -- Best regards, Tom Weber Cryptzone Group AB _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
