On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Daniel Stenberg <dan...@haxx.se> wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Mitchell Hashimoto wrote: > >> Resurrecting this because I realized I never got a response here. What is >> the status of this patch? Was there some issue somewhere I was supposed to >> be looking at? > > > I read the question roughly like this: > > Why does this function take an existing channel and use it, rather than > creating a completely new channel in the same style many other functions > work? > > Is there a particular benefit from using an existing channel rather than to > creating a new one? >
Ah got it, I'll take a look again, sorry about that. > I haven't read up the specs on this thing, but after you've sent this auth > agent request over the channel, is there a limitation to how this channel is > to be used or what is the application supposed to do (or not to do) with the > channel after a successful return? There is no limitation at all. The channel is still fully functional. Best, Mitchell > > -- > > / daniel.haxx.se > _______________________________________________ > libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
