Daniel Stenberg wrote: > It still means slightly more work for the lazy MSVC "include all files > into a project" people but at least we offer a fairly easy solution.
They also get a .dsp to click on. >> Do you prefer that I apply it on top of the existing master, or that I >> revert d512b25 and squash the new commit into d512b25 so that the entire >> change is in a single commit and that we don't have the broken >> Makefile.inc state in-between? > > I'm not sure I understand. What you've already pushed cannot be changed, > so just go ahead apply on master. Yes, sorry, the only benefit would be that the state of the files directly preceding the commit would not be the broken in-between. //Peter _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
