On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Henrik Nordström <hen...@henriknordstrom.net> wrote: > > tis 2014-06-24 klockan 22:28 -0600 skrev Eduardo Silva: >> hmm so if my socket is in an event loop and i get notifications, >> besides to walk through my list of active channels, for each one >> should i also walk for each stream_id ?, if so, how can i know the >> number of streams that a channel is handling ? > > > By the application you are running. > > port forwarding -> only the default stream. > > shell -> default stream + stream 1 (stderr). > > > Should be safe to assume the server do not unexpectedly start using > stream numbers you don't know about. >
thanks for the feedback. Just to confirm if my approach is correct: 1. i connect to the SSH server and request a tcp-forwarding 2. then in my program i have an epoll(7) loop looking for EPOLLIN (READ) events: 3. for each incoming event i do: 3.a try to accept a channel, if it works create the channel and add it to a list (and jump to 3.c) 3.b if accept a channel failed, try to read for each channel registered in my list 3.c for those channels who succeeded on reading data, write back a response, then close the channel (channel cleanup) but for some reason i see some missing channels notifications when adding a simple concurrency of 2 clients. Should i use a different mechanism to multiplex events on different channels ?, is there something wrong with the proposed model ? any help is appreciated -- Eduardo Silva http://edsiper.linuxchile.cl http://monkey-project.com _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
