On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Peter Stuge wrote:
All in the name of going where there's already a large amount of users, it
brings features and it encourages and simplifies collaboration even
further. Do it "like the kids do".
Since when was being mainstream ever a good thing?
Lowering barriers and reducing friction for newcomers are good things in my
mind. Apparently I'm not the only one thinking so.
GitHub Inc. is a privately held company in the USA. I don't see how it could
be beneficial in any way for the project to give up its independence.
It would not give up independence. It would use one or more services provided
by that company.
It is related to cost, but not strictly the price for the certificate but
even more so the effort and maintenence cost in time and energy.
Please speak for yourself.
Did I *ever* speak for anyone else here? Of course I speak for myself and as
the person admining www.libssh2.org.
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
