On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Will Cosgrove wrote:
In kmdhgGPsha1kex_state_t, I changed the following:
Ok, but I don't see how any of those changes cause any breaking change. They're internal and hidden from users so unless I'm missing something they're totally fine and benign.
As for the known_hosts error values, in the future I would strongly encourage the use of unique error codes going forward. Writing end-user applications rely on unique error codes to generate meaningful user error strings to present to the user.
But they're different error codes, they're not in a single number range. I will agree though that it is generally more convenient for everyone to keep the error codes in the same range even for different functions.
However, I don't think exposing our return codes will be helpful to very many users...
-- / daniel.haxx.se _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
