On Apr 22, 2007, at 2:52 PM, James Housley wrote: > I think maybe we should remove the *nb() functions and make the old > names just work. I would also like to keep old programs working in > all cases, as long as they didn't set non-blocking to true (since we > know that didn't work). But before proceeding I would like to wait a > while, April 29th, to allow others a chance to chime in.
I'm not a committer, so I don't know if my vote counts, but I would definitely favor using the blocking mode of the socket to determine the behavior of old functions and removing the *nb() functions. The only situation where this breaks legacy code is if someone has improperly set the blocking mode on the socket, so it is really just exposing a bug in the client code, not showing a regression in libssh2. -Lucas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
