Eberhard Mattes has filed a bug report about the libssh2 use of 0xFF
instead of 1 for a TRUE boolean value. He is correct about the RFC,
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc4251.html , section 5. It does look like
we are in the wrong, and have been since the beginning. My question
is why might 0xFF been used. He says it fails with one of the
commercial servers, but would 0x01 fail on more? Is it really safe
to do the change? Should there be an option to use 0xFF?
Jim
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
X - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TheHousleys.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A: Yes.
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
