On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, James Housley wrote:
>
>> Some quick test with the sftp and sftp_nonblocking programs in
>> example/simple shows that the amount of data requested in the call
>> to libssh2_sftp_read() is much more important the the SSH packet
>> size.
>
> What about a comparison with openssh's sftp next to our
> sftp_nonblocking?
OpenSSH sftp: 0:01.06, 0:01.04, 0:01.01
libssh2 sftp_nonblock (libssh2 packet size:4K, sftp_nonblock read 64K
"static"):
0:01.60, 0:01.60, 0:01.58
That looks close enough to be called the same.
Jim
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
X - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TheHousleys.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortune Not Found:
Abort, Retry, Ignore?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
