On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Guenter Knauf wrote: > this list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net always replies to the sender; > it seems that the Reply-To field is not setup; is this intended, or just an > oversight? If the later, can we perhaps change it?
That's the default setup for mailman mailing list and the wording on the mailman config page strongly advices admins to leave the setting like this. Personally, I dislike it as well and I always set Reply-To: on lists that I setup. In this case, while I co-admin this list with Sara, I have no desire to run over any previous decisions or desires of hers or of previous admins just because I have a different personal objective. I'll appreciate some more comments on the benefits of Reply-To or not. And yes, there are articles on the net with documents such as "blablabla considered harmful" but they exist for both sides of this argument so this is mostly a question of personal preference. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
