On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Can't we use a make target for this, rather than a script? I'm thinking > 'make indent'.
Yeah, sure. But I don't think people will use it uncondionally on a lot of source files very often so it will make more sense to be used like "./indent.sh mynewfile.c" or similar. > Really my concern is that there are now several scripts in the top-level > directory; maketgz, get_ver.awk, buildconf.. That feels somewhat messy to > me, although I may be over-pedantic. Should we move those to a build-aux/ > sub-directory? Yeah, we could or perhaps should. Feel free to clean up. > is there a reason for using the buildconf script rather than the recommended > 'autoreconf --install'? Recommended by who/what? I've never seen nor used autoreconf! I personally don't care much what we call the script, I just picked a name I use in a few other projects. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
