Bugs item #2641265, was opened at 2009-02-26 11:16 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=703942&aid=2641265&group_id=125852
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: SFTP Group: v1.0 (example) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Daniel Stenberg (bagder) Summary: slow SFTP download speed Initial Comment: SFTP download speed slower in ~10 times then upload speed over SFTP in the same network conditions. As I am understood it is already known issue. Do you have patch or some workaround to increase SFTP download speed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-03-04 20:44 Message: clarification: "Bane of Open Source" :-) was not referring to this project, it was a reference to the levels of "abandonware" that M$ loves to crow about when claiming why they are "so much better". Never mind that M$ routinely abandons any product it wants whenever it wants and with no recourse whatsoever. I have in fact encountered a number of "abandonware" projects in the open source community. For instance PHP itself has become a very big concern to me. Now I am very happy to see that they just recently released about 300 bug fixes for 5.2.9. But if you look up the bugs on that list you will see that many of them have been sitting idle for 2 years!!! So finally after no visible activity an amazing amount of activity. But in those last two years of no activity I've been getting concerned. On the other hand, M$ has the attitude that if we shipped a bug before and we didn't get x thousands of complaints about it, then no matter how bad the bug is, it's okay to ship it again. and oh by the way we also hid the phone number were you are supposed to report those bugs... (I have this from an MS insider) So yes, there is a difference between how open source and M$ operate. But the open source model does not always work either, even though there is the theoretical ability for anyone to fix a bug, as a practical matter most people have neither the time nor the skill to fix these bugs and so if the original developer community stops supporting a project is usually disappears. and thus the concern about abandonware. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-03-04 20:23 Message: okay, I accept that some problems are hard to fix. And I am somewhat reassured by your response, especially the speed of it. But I will tell you that libssh2 for PHP has in fact caused me endless grief with the many bugs it has. And AFAIK it uses this library. Now I've been assuming that the problems I've been encountering are with the PECL library itself and not with the underlying libssh2. But after seeing this bug report I started to wonder just where the real problem actually is. SSH2 for PHP is in insanely bad shape. http://pecl.php.net/package/ssh2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Tor Arntsen (tor-arntsen) Date: 2009-03-04 17:19 Message: People _are_ maintaining this package, but this particular problem requires a re-design of how libssh2 currently works, more or less. In other words, the performance problem is a bit tricky to solve and that is the reason it is still not fixed. Other libssh2 problems are routinely being fixed, so it's not the bane of open source projects just yet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2009-03-04 17:06 Message: libssh2 is a very important and widely deployed library, especially by PHP. This sounds like a pretty important problem. How come there isn't any one maintaining this package? Am I being naive/unreasonable? Is this the bane of open source that M$ loves to crow about? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Stenberg (bagder) Date: 2009-02-26 11:56 Message: it is known, but there's nobody working on it and there's no patch that I know of. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=703942&aid=2641265&group_id=125852 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
