On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I kind of like the flexibility of a wiki homepage, though, since it (in > theory) allows more people to more easily improve the web pages. But I also > trust you will update it often enough to not be a problem.. ;)
Yes I agree that a wiki is the better approach when there's a particular amount of people involved (which we've at least previously have lacked). But I'm not fond of having the wiki repeat docs that is already present in the man pages as it makes us write the same thing in two places and that leads to inconsistences. I then rather prefer having the web site updated from CVS/git or similar, and generate HTML from the man pages to allow all committers to change the site. -- / daniel.haxx.se ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ libssh2-devel mailing list libssh2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
