On Monday, December 06, 2010 18:58:12 you wrote: > Andreas said: > > You know that sftp_read is a blocking implementation > > and there is a sftp_async_read? > > Wow, that made a big difference! > Now libssh is the fastest at downloading (by a very narrow margin), > instead of the slowest.
Thanks for the results! > The latest master from git is slightly faster than 0.4.6 at > downloading in async mode, though much slower in sync mode: That's good to know, we plan to work on this stuff again soon. I plan to setup our new testing infrastructure in the next weeks. > http://60bits.net/sni/libssh2-perf.htm > > I have a feeling I might be approaching the filesystem throughput > limits on this machine; I may run a separate benchmark for this. > But that doesn't really matter, because I am now getting the > performance I wanted. Great, please let us know if you find issues. We try to improve our testing infrastructure so that we can detect regressions in future. Cheers, -- andreas
