On Wednesday 26 February 2014 05:28:00 Alan Dunn wrote:
> Aris/Andreas:
Hi,
> I thought I'd say if there's anything I can do to make it easier for
> you to evaluate my ECDSA host key patches (e.g. I could reformat the
> work as a patch set that has the bug fixes, the changes to add ECDSA
> as an option for binds, and the option to use ECDSA keys in one of the
> libssh sample programs to make it so you only have to run one of the
> sample programs to evaluate that the patches seem to work), then let
> me know. Otherwise if you're just too busy at the moment I completely
> understand.
I would love that, but I don't know what Aris wanted that we add. A hostkey
option which has a list of keys and keys being assigned when read would work,
but do we want it that way. the server is not near to openssh and doesn't use
sshd_config at all. I think it shouldn't too.
Aris please comment!
-- andreas
> Thanks,
> - Alan
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Andreas Schneider <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 02:29:32 Dustin Oprea wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Andreas Schneider
> >
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 25 February 2014 22:19:49 Dustin Oprea wrote:
> >> > > Alan/Andreas:
> >> > Hi Dustin,
> >> >
> >> > > I'm guessing that the value assigned to ssh_key_struct.type
> >> > > (ssh_keytypes_e) comes directly from the client. Is this true?
> >> >
> >> > no, It is a string. :)
> >> >
> >> > http://git.libssh.org/projects/libssh.git/tree/src/pki.c#n85
> >> >
> >> > or
> >> >
> >> > http://git.libssh.org/projects/libssh.git/tree/src/pki.c#n206
> >>
> >> So type_c has whatever original value was given to us?
> >
> > I think so, yes.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: CC014E3D
> > www.cryptomilk.org [email protected]
--
Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: CC014E3D
www.cryptomilk.org [email protected]