Hallo Peter, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> >>> Index: ChangeLog >>> 2005-02-24 Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS): The Portland group's >>> compiler does not pass --whole-archive. Move gnu ld check for >>> the flag to the top so it can be overridden. >>> (AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG): Unset whole_archive_flag_spec for >>> the portland group's c++ compiler too. >>> Reported by Jeff Squyres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I was just trying to forward port this and then commit them all together > when I came across a problem (actually two, but the first one involves > you :-p) > > This patch was committed to HEAD: > 2004-11-14 Gary V. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS): Typo: s/--rpath/-rpath/g. > (_LT_LANG_CXX_CONFIG): Ditto. > > The other problem was a bug in my patch, I unset > hardcode_libdir_flag_spec_ld instead of hardcode_libdir_flag_spec. > > Anyway, my main problem is --rpath, I see it all over the place on > branch-1-5, and it is even used in this patch. Is there a problem with > it?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-11/msg00039.html > Why is the above patch only on HEAD? --rpath appears in branch-2-0 too. branch-2-0 is stable! --rpath only causes a repeated flags on linux, with pkgconfig (since pkgconfig uses -rpath), so --rpath for other arches and non-gnu ld is perfectly fine (and expected!). On HEAD, when you merge, I'd like to continue to use -rpath for GNU ld though. Thanks for the heads up. And apologies for the crappy ChangeLog entry. Cheers, Gary. -- Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org} Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
