Albert Chin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:38:58PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >>Until we get as far as implementing something that enables us to use >>the pre-installed libtool properly, which implies doing configuration >>on-the-fly, recognizing ABI-changing flags and all such tricky stuff, >>and possibly generating config bits in the current directory/.libs or >>so. > > I agree!
Very well, then let's put it to the vote! I never use the installed
libtool myself, and can't think of a compelling reason to keep it around
that outweighs the misunderstandings that it causes. But, on the other
hand I'm not sure I want to rock the boat too hard...
+0.5 to remove installed libtool script in HEAD
-0.5 for branch-2-0
-1 for branch-1-5
What say you?
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
