Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >>>* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:01:01PM CET: >>> >>>>Okay to commit? >>> >>>This is getting more and more complicated.. >>>but yes. >> >>There is an alternative to the complicated part of this patch. We >>could move config/ltmain.sh out of $top_srcdir/config and trade a few >>more files in $top_srcdir for a simpler libtoolize? >> >>Now that I think about it, it does seem sensible to make the $top_srcdir >>layout of installed files used by libtoolize match their layout in the >>installation tree, which will make libtoolizes life a whole lot easier >>all round. Shall we aim at that instead of this patch? > > > I'm not so sure things *will* get easier that way.
Sure they do... it saves 42 lines of code in libtoolize infact :-)
Patch to follow.
> Would it not suffice to put all the testsuite tests which would need
> this, into `installcheck'? Would that defeat some purpose?
I'd rather be able to tell that the latest libtool is broken *before* I
install it over the old one!
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
