* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:58:28PM CEST: > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:04:17PM CEST: > > > > This is Alexandre Oliva's patch with a test case. OK to apply to branch-1-5 > > and forward port? > > Yes. Please show the forward-port, though. Nice and clean fix, BTW. > > May I suggest to add the additional step below to the test, to link > another convenience lib into the convenience lib?
Come to think of it: AFAICS there is no technical reason to prefer renaming to newobj=lt$counter-$objbase over, say, newobj=$objbase-lt$counter I believe, as a user, the latter would strike me as less intrusive. Thinking of someone sorting the output of `nm'. Could we do that instead? Not a serious issue though, IMHO. Leaving object order intact is much more important. Regards, Ralf
