Hallo Ralf! Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Ah, you mean using _LT_TAGVAR without also using _LT_TAGDECL, right?
Yes, _LT_TAGVAR abstracts per language variables, _LT_TAGDECL pushes them
through config.status.
> Anyway, the changes you want me to make make more other changes
> necessary. Will look into how ugly the result will end up.
Okay, thanks.
>>Fine for HEAD with the _LT_TAG changes. How serious is the bug it fixes?
>
> Makes at least the following configurations work (better):
> CC=gcc # CFLAGS containing some deprecated flag
> [[snip]]
> ...
>
> The first mentioned configuration prompted a bugreport against 1.5.x
> recently. [[snip]]
> Hmm. Given the number of configurations (esp. the first item has bitten
> and is quite surprising if all you do is a gcc upgrade) I might do all
> three branches. For branch-1-5, no abstractions, however.
Agreed.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
