Re: FYI: support standalone libltdl [libtool--devo--1.0--patch-221]

[Gary V . Vaughan]

Hi Albert,

On 24 Aug 2005, at 15:31, Albert Chin wrote:

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 02:55:17AM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

Reorganise the libtool tree to create a bootstrapped libltdl for

      installation to the libtoolize master tree, so that libltdl is

      not installed on the developers machine.  Part of this change
      requires some duplication of rules between Makefile.am (which
      builds libltdl for this distribution) and libltdl/Makefile.am
      (which is used by projects that libltoolize --ltdl --copy), so

      generate libltdl/Makefile.am from that:

useable even in the extreme case of when automake and autoconf are libtool now really does use a single toplevel Makefile.am, and we

So the result of this is code under libltdl that has nothing to do
with libltdl (ltmain.m4sh, libtool.m4, etc.)? Seems kinda odd.

added to your project, with the correct timestamps when you invoke
libtoolize --ltdl.  It was odd having them under CVS in different places
to where they are when you import a libltdl tree into your project!

Cheers,
    Gary.
--

Research Scientist   ( '/   http://www.tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/{libtool,m4}
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

It has everything to do with libltdl! Libtoolize goes to some pain (less pain than before with the new structure) to make sure all those files are Gary V. Vaughan ())_. gary@ {lilith.warpmail.net,gnu.org},[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part