Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:52:44PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >Maybe we should add a couple of public #define's for ltdl API? > >Like this: > > #define LTDL_MAJOR 2 > > #define LTDL_MINOR 0 > > #define LTDL_REVISION 0 > > #define LTDL_RELEASE ((LTDL_MAJOR << 16) | (LTDL_MINOR << 8) | > > LTDL_REVISION) *snip* > >Thoughts? > > No, I don't like this. We already maintain version-info, so perhaps we > could find a way to push the range of supported interface numbers to > the user at runtime. There is already ltversion.m4 which might be > enough, or perhaps we could stand to enhance it and hang a configure > time ltdl interface check macro?
OK. I guess users can get around it just by checking for a specific function in -lltdl. Sounds sensible, and is by far easiest. And we _do_ have all interface additions/removals nicely documented.. > This all sounds like post 2.0 to me... Fine with me. As I said, I was just thinking out lout. Cheers, Ralf