Hallo Ralf!

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> To increase the chance of being correct this time, I have tested
> these compilers:[1].  And I have reread most threads of the last 18
> months that dealt with Solaris, to make sure there was no report
> that disproved this solution.

Sorry, I just applied your patch and tested on my old Solaris 7 x86,
with Forte, and nothing compiles at all.  I also checked back 9 years
on the mail archives, and Gord couldn't get your $Wl hack to work on
SunOS 4:

   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/1997-04/msg00001.html

If you can't be bothered to test your patches thoroughly, then I
can't see much point in posting them! ;-)  ROFL.

> OK to apply to both branches?

I'm sorry Ralf, but I just couldn't resist.  You are diligent beyand
the call of duty!!  Yes, please apply.

> Apologies to Yuri for the huge delay, and thanks to him for both his
> patience and insistence to fix this.  :-)

Argh!  My sides... I can't take any more!  :-p :-) O:-)

>         * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 [ solaris ] (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS)
>         (_LT_LANG_CXX_CONFIG) < whole_archive_flag_spec >:
>         Fix this once and for all, for both the SUN compiler suite
>         (cc/CC/f77/f90/f95) and GCC.
>         Reported by Yuri Pukhalsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to