Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Gary,
Hallo Ralf!
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:15:29PM CEST:
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
2006-05-16 Albert Chin-A-Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tests/link-order.at: Take hardcode_direct and
hardcode_direct_static into consideration when testing
link order.
Thanks. Applied both this change and the linked patch.
Thanks. Are you volunteering for the backport to branch-1-5 (which has
a similar issue) or should I do it?
Luckily, in my reply to your next email we've agreed that it doesn't
need a backport. ;-)
Nope. The test was broken before the new feature. The test fix Albert
suggested before implementing hardcode_direct_static needs a backport.
It's just the new feature that doesn't.
Oh right... I hadn't noticed tests/linkorder.test in the branch-1-5
tree. I'll do the backport.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. [EMAIL PROTECTED],gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://trac.azazil.net/projects/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
