Hello Tom, Petr, * Tom Tromey wrote on Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:37:35AM CEST: > >>>>> "Petr" == Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Petr> would be possible to include GNU/kFreeBSD support into shlibpath.m4. > Petr> This change together with slightly modified boehm-gc gives reasonable > Petr> results, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2006-05/msg00093.html. > > We try to avoid local modifications to files like this. > It came from libtool, as I recall. Could you see if the problem is > fixed upstream? If so, we could import and "upstream-looking" patch. > If not, the patch should probably go there first.
I think you're looking for this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2006-03/msg00005.html Somebody needs to convince the authors of the patches (Cc:ed) to assign or disclaim copyright, or rewrite the patches, or convince me (or another Libtool maintainer, FWIW) that the changes are trivial enough not to warrant a copyright assignment. (And no, changing | - dynamic_linker='GNU/Linux ld.so' | + dynamic_linker='GNU ld.so' for GNU/Linux is not ok for Libtool, as suggested in Petr's patch.) Cheers, Ralf
