On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 02:57:32AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >>This looks OK to me (tested on cygwin and linux with no regressions). > > > >Me too. Please apply this one. > > I assumed you meant me, so I applied it. (Does Peter have commit access?)
Yes I do, but thanks for taking care of that detail, it's been a while since I used the commit script and I'm sure I would have messed up at least once before getting it right :-) > >FWIW, I'd rather have at least the hairy bits postponed until shortly > >afterwards. I was aware of that, but figured that libtool 2.x has been so long in coming that I no longer can tell just how soon "soon" is. Besides, the previous patch was very stale and needed updating, so I figured I might as well send an update and see what happens. However, I'm in no way pushing this, I just want to have it on the table... Cheers, Peter
