On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This patch causes a testsuite failure on GNU/Linux.
As a step toward stabilization, I would like to propose to revert the
above patch. Its acceptance should rely on its test passing on at least
more than one of Darwin, MinGW, GNU/Linux, and AIX. (Does it currently
pass on any of them?)
OK to revert? Or, rather: does anybody have problems with the reversal?
Temporarily or permanently?
It seems that lt_dladvise_preload() is needed to allow ltdl to be more
secure for applications which need it. It should be ok to revert the
patch temporarily so that the forthcoming release can be cut.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
