Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:05:54PM CET: > Den 2009-03-20 12:16 skrev Peter Rosin: >> I think it is a bug that LT_OUTPUT does not create the libtool >> script when you do "./config.status --recheck".
> Ok to push as attached? Hmm, this goes only to show that it would have been a bad idea to let LT_OUTPUT be the default mode: --no-create is intended to not create output files. In the long run, we should add macros to do compile/link tests that use libtool variables, but not `./libtool', I guess. Or only a temporary script. But yes, for the current semantics, I guess your patch is the best we can do. Please apply, thanks. Cheers, Ralf > commit 301ebd4d3c2dc6c7f4d22996cf3b35e78b2ff492 > Author: Peter Rosin <[email protected]> > Date: Fri Mar 20 13:43:26 2009 +0100 > > LT_OUTPUT should always create the libtool script. > > * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (LT_OUTPUT): Make LT_OUTPUT Ignore the > --no-create configure option, and assume that the user wants > to use an up-to-date libtool script if the LT_OUTPUT macro is > present. > * tests/early-libtool.at: Make sure we do not regress. >
