Hello Michael, I'm pretty short on review time ATM; sorry for not providing a detailed review.
* Michael Haubenwallner wrote on Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:22:31AM CEST: > > Ok, here's the third way of supporting DESTDIR on hppa-hpux, now without > the +cdp linker flag (#2), but using the absolute target libdir in the > 'internal name' instead, to fix the security issue of #1. Using absolute paths seems like a step backward, with all the world wanting relocatable packages more than anything. I don't think we should go that way unless we cannot help it at all. But maybe I have misunderstood you latest approach? Thanks, Ralf
