[ dropping libtool@ ] Hi Pierre,
thanks for the report and patch! * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:01:40AM CET: > The "normal" check was fixed some time ago, but the fallback code was > overlooked. This patch fixes that as well. So that means you've encountered it with some code, on some system. Does your patch fix a testcase there, and if not, care to add (or describe) one? Then, I'm seeing a small inconsistency between func_win32_libid and the libtool.m4 text (taken post-patch, but the inconsistency was there before): (pe-i386(.*architecture: i386)?|pe-arm-wince|pe-x86-64) (pei*-i386(.*architecture: i386)?|pe-arm-wince|pe-x86-64) Which one's right? > Btw, why isn't the original fix (b5282894) in the 2.2.6b release? 2.2.6b was a pure security fix release and has only a couple of changes over 2.2.6a. > The fix is over one year old and still isn't in any released version. Yeah, that's because we've not been getting the current branch in release shape. Sorry for the inconvenience. AFAICS copyright papers are not in place for you yet; more about this off-list (but please don't send more patch text until this is sorted out). Thanks, Ralf
